I2dl gradientDescent

< Back = Gradient descent =

Explanation: Newton method vs. Gradient descent
The Newton method can converge faster than gradient descent in some cases because it uses second-order information about the optimization landscape. In contrast, gradient descent only uses first-order information, namely the gradient of the loss with respect to the parameters.

The Newton method uses the inverse of the Hessian matrix, which is a second-order approximation of the local geometry of the loss landscape, to compute the search direction. This can help to identify and navigate regions of the landscape that are relatively flat, which can slow down gradient descent.

However, there are some drawbacks to using the Newton method. Firstly, computing and inverting the Hessian can be computationally expensive, especially for large-scale problems with many parameters. Secondly, the Newton method can be sensitive to the choice of initialization, as it requires the Hessian to be positive definite in order to guarantee convergence. Finally, the Newton method can sometimes converge to poor local minima, whereas gradient descent has a better chance of finding global minima.

In general, gradient descent is a more widely used optimization method for training deep neural networks due to its simplicity, robustness, and ability to handle high-dimensional optimization problems effectively. However, in some specific cases, such as when the loss landscape is well-conditioned and has a low curvature, the Newton method can converge faster and provide better performance than gradient descent.